Governance scores
Tech100 AI Ethics & Governance Index ranking and filters.
Tech100 AI Ethics & Governance Index - Constituents
Showing 25 of 100 companies (preview). Verify your email to unlock the full list.
| Rank | Weight | Company | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | Composite AI Governance & Ethics Score | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4% |
Microsoft
(MSFT)
|
100.0 | 96.0 | 99.0 | 88.0 | 81.0 | 93.0 |
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 100.0 | 96.0 | 99.0 | 88.0 | 81.0 | 93.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Cisco Systems (CSCO)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #2, Cisco Systems has proposed AIGES composite 91 versus 91 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 94.0 | 93.0 | 93.0 | 94.0 | 79.0 | 91.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #3, Alphabet Inc. has proposed AIGES composite 90 versus 88 on 01 Jul 2026 (+2). Q3 evidence: Google signed the EU AI Act Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content on 24 July and committed to practical provenance and disclosure measures including C2PA/SynthID. Google Cloud was also designated a critical third-party provider to the UK financial sector.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 100.0 | 87.0 | 94.0 | 88.0 | 82.0 | 90.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Adobe (ADBE)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #4, Adobe has proposed AIGES composite 86 versus 84 on 01 Jul 2026 (+2). Q3 evidence: Adobe's 25 August Content Credentials documentation describes automatic provenance disclosures for fully Firefly-generated assets. This supports improved public transparency around generative content and disclosed provenance controls; it does not establish that all these capabilities were first implemented in Q3.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 96.0 | 89.0 | 88.0 | 88.0 | 67.0 | 86.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Autodesk (ADSK)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #5, Autodesk has proposed AIGES composite 82 versus 82 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 86.0 | 83.0 | 89.0 | 84.0 | 68.0 | 82.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
NVIDIA (NVDA)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #6, NVIDIA has proposed AIGES composite 81 versus 78 on 01 Jul 2026 (+3). Q3 evidence: NVIDIA strengthened public AI-safety controls late in September with its Open Agent Safety Platform/OpenShell approach for constraining and monitoring agentic systems, and participated in the 29 September US industry accord on AI standards. Evidence is strongest for operational safety and governance controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 92.0 | 87.0 | 72.0 | 84.0 | 70.0 | 81.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Intuit (INTU)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #7, Intuit has proposed AIGES composite 80 versus 80 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 83.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 81.0 | 70.0 | 80.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Arm Holdings (ARM)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #8, Arm Holdings has proposed AIGES composite 79 versus 77 on 01 Jul 2026 (+2). Q3 evidence: Arm published a 28 September trust architecture for agentic AI, emphasizing independent observation, isolation, policy enforcement and security across the agent trust boundary. This materially improves public evidence of technical governance and control design.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 70.0 | 88.0 | 83.0 | 85.0 | 67.0 | 79.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Intel (INTC)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #9, Intel has proposed AIGES composite 77 versus 77 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 77.0 | 87.0 | 74.0 | 85.0 | 63.0 | 77.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Honeywell Technologies (HON)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #10, Honeywell Technologies has proposed AIGES composite 76 versus 76 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 86.0 | 86.0 | 83.0 | 75.0 | 52.0 | 76.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
GE HealthCare (GEHC)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #11, GE HealthCare has proposed AIGES composite 74 versus 74 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 75.0 | 89.0 | 61.0 | 86.0 | 59.0 | 74.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Apple (AAPL)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #12, Apple has proposed AIGES composite 74 versus 70 on 01 Jul 2026 (+4). Q3 evidence: Apple's September Siri architecture emphasized on-device processing, Private Cloud Compute, non-retention of personal data and independent verifiability. Geographic rollout constraints tied to regulation also made compliance design more explicit.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 84.0 | 82.0 | 66.0 | 76.0 | 61.0 | 74.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Palo Alto Networks (PANW)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #13, Palo Alto Networks has proposed AIGES composite 73 versus 70 on 01 Jul 2026 (+3). Q3 evidence: Palo Alto Networks expanded Q3 disclosure around AI-agent governance and control planes, including cross-surface agent governance and the Frontier AI Critical Defense Program. The quarter adds concrete monitoring, red-team and vulnerability-management evidence.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 68.0 | 83.0 | 71.0 | 80.0 | 63.0 | 73.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Amazon (AMZN)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #14, Amazon has proposed AIGES composite 72 versus 69 on 01 Jul 2026 (+3). Q3 evidence: AWS was designated a critical third-party provider to the UK financial sector, bringing resilience testing, self-assessment and incident-reporting requirements. AWS also refreshed responsible-AI guidance for agentic workloads and expanded governance/security patterns around Bedrock AgentCore.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 89.0 | 75.0 | 52.0 | 75.0 | 68.0 | 72.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
NXP Semiconductors (NXPI)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #15, NXP Semiconductors has proposed AIGES composite 71 versus 71 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 62.0 | 87.0 | 65.0 | 79.0 | 64.0 | 71.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Comcast (CMCSA)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #16, Comcast has proposed AIGES composite 71 versus 71 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 70.0 | 71.0 | 83.0 | 71.0 | 59.0 | 71.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #17, Advanced Micro Devices has proposed AIGES composite 70 versus 68 on 01 Jul 2026 (+2). Q3 evidence: AMD reinforced responsible and secure deployment in Q3 through enterprise/government AI blueprints designed for hardened environments. Its public Responsible AI framework and Responsible AI Council remain the control baseline.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 67.0 | 81.0 | 62.0 | 79.0 | 61.0 | 70.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Honeywell Aerospace (HONA)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #18, Honeywell Aerospace has provisional initial AIGES composite 70; no July baseline. Initialisation evidence: New company-level constituent after the Honeywell Aerospace spin-off. The initial score is provisional and reflects inherited Honeywell Responsible AI governance disclosures, board-level AI-risk oversight before separation, and aerospace-specific emphasis on certification, safety, transparency and pilot support. Post-separation company-specific AI governance disclosure remains limited.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 | 70.0 | 48.0 | 70.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
PayPal Holdings (PYPL)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #19, PayPal Holdings has proposed AIGES composite 69 versus 69 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 61.0 | 75.0 | 61.0 | 74.0 | 72.0 | 69.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Qualcomm (QCOM)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #20, Qualcomm has proposed AIGES composite 68 versus 68 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 70.0 | 86.0 | 56.0 | 72.0 | 55.0 | 68.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Linde plc (LIN)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #21, Linde plc has proposed AIGES composite 68 versus 61 on 01 Jul 2026 (+7). Q3 evidence: Linde approved a Global AI Policy on 31 July establishing an AI Council, enterprise-wide principles, third-party/vendor scope, training and regulatory-compliance controls. This is one of the quarter's clearest new formal governance frameworks.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 62.0 | 65.0 | 74.0 | 79.0 | 59.0 | 68.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
CrowdStrike (CRWD)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #22, CrowdStrike has proposed AIGES composite 66 versus 62 on 01 Jul 2026 (+4). Q3 evidence: CrowdStrike launched Falcon Guardian/AIDR runtime controls, AI safety initiatives and partnerships for securing coding agents in September. The evidence directly addresses runtime enforcement, prompt injection, data leakage and cyber-safety governance.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 60.0 | 64.0 | 64.0 | 66.0 | 76.0 | 66.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Seagate Technology (STX)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #23, Seagate Technology has proposed AIGES composite 65 versus 65 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 70.0 | 66.0 | 66.0 | 63.0 | 62.0 | 65.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
T-Mobile US (TMUS)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #24, T-Mobile US has proposed AIGES composite 65 versus 65 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 73.0 | 74.0 | 60.0 | 69.0 | 50.0 | 65.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Ferrovial SE (FER)
At the 01 Oct 2026 rebalance, rank #25, Ferrovial SE has proposed AIGES composite 63 versus 63 on 01 Jul 2026 (+0). Q3 evidence: No attributable Jul-Sep 2026 AI ethics/governance update found in the reviewed public record. July baseline scores are retained; absence of public disclosure is not evidence of absence of internal controls.
History
| As-of date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 67.0 | 63.0 | 59.0 | 55.0 | 73.0 | 63.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Free and unlimited access — we’ll email a 6-digit code.
Explore Tech100 AI Ethics & Governance Index resources
Navigate the index breakdown, performance, and methodology from one place.
Performance & attribution
See contributors, return breakdowns, and performance trends.
Go to performance →Portfolio analytics
Compare supported model portfolios, risk, concentration, and sector tilts.
Open portfolio analytics →