TECH100 Index
Governance and ethics scores across leading technology firms.
Sortable, filterable indicators for transparency, accountability, and oversight. Data is fetched live from the SustainaCore backend.
TECH100 constituents
Showing 200 of 200 companies.
| Rebalance Date | Rank | Weight | Company | AIGES Composite | Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct-2025 | 1 | 4% |
Microsoft
|
95.0 |
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 98.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 96.0 | 92.0 | 95.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Cisco
Q3’25: Change — Ethical Principles +1, Transparency +1, Stakeholder Engagement +1. New: Cisco Blog (2025‑08‑07): Responsible AI framework—fairness, accountability, inclusion—operational updates. Direction: positive reinforcement of responsible‑AI program and outreach.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 91.0 | 91.0 | 92.0 | 88.0 | 91.0 | 91.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Alphabet (Google)
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Alphabet (Google) (GOOGL): Implemented new AI ethics guidelines in February 2025, marking a policy shift. Google’s updated AI Principles reversed a previous blanket prohibition on AI uses in weapons and surveillance, ...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 89.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Verisk Analytics
Q3’25: Change — Ethical Principles +1, Transparency +1. New: Press release (2025‑09‑16): GenAI underwriting assistant developed under explicit ethical AI principles. Direction: positive—product aligned to stated AI ethics.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 86.0 | 91.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 86.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
NVIDIA
Q3’25: Change — Ethical Principles +1, Transparency +1. New: Trust Center: Trustworthy AI principles highlighted across privacy, safety, nondiscrimination. Direction: incremental positive on disclosures and principles.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 86.0 | 81.0 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Cognizant
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Cognizant has a comprehensive Responsible AI program. It published detailed AI Principles (covering fairness, transparency, accountability, security, etc.) and even achieved an accredited AI management certification.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 76.0 | 84.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Adobe
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Adobe has published AI Ethics Principles for years and runs an internal AI review committee. It screens all new AI products and co-founded the Content Authenticity Initiative to promote transparency.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 83.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
GE HealthCare
Q3’25: Change — Transparency +1, Regulatory Alignment +1. New: EU AI research transparency notice (2025‑08‑26) outlining data use and compliance posture. Direction: positive on transparency and EU compliance prep.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 81.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 91.0 | 70.0 | 81.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Intel
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Intel publishes its Responsible AI Principles and supports oversight via an internal AI ethics council. It is active in AI governance discourse globally and incorporates policy references in disclosures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 80.0 | 82.0 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Fiserv
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Fiserv has embedded responsible AI into its corporate practices. It explicitly mentions advancing “ethical AI” as part of building trust in financial technology.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 70.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
NXP Semiconductors
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: NXP Semiconductors launched an AI Ethics initiative and advocates for ethical AI development, especially for edge and automotive AI. NXP’s framework emphasizes principles like human autonomy, explicability, and privac...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Meta (Facebook)
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Meta invests in fairness audits, open-sources AI models, and engages with academia. While transparency has improved, a lack of external oversight board lowers its governance score.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 79.0 | 82.0 | 79.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Apple
Q3’25: Change — Ethical Principles +1. New: Coverage (2025‑09‑05): Privacy‑first, on‑device AI approach reiterated. Direction: positive on privacy‑centric AI stance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 80.0 | 86.0 | 75.0 | 82.0 | 70.0 | 79.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Intuit
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Intuit outlines Responsible AI Principles and uses a cross-functional risk evaluation process for AI features. It regularly involves external privacy and ethics experts in its product governance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 75.0 | 78.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 90.0 | 78.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Autodesk
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Autodesk is committed to responsible and ethical AI. The Autodesk Trust Center explicitly states it adheres to governance processes to ensure AI is developed and used ethically and securely.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 76.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
AMD
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: AMD joined the Responsible AI Institute and formed an internal AI council. It’s early in its ethical AI journey but aligns with industry frameworks and begins structured reporting.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 73.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Workday
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Workday is notable for conducting external audits of its hiring AI to comply with NYC Local Law 144. They disclose fairness initiatives and maintain a responsible AI working group.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 68.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Arm Holdings
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Arm has taken a proactive role in AI ethics: it formed an internal AI ethics working group and published an “AI Trust Manifesto” to guide ethical AI design. Arm advocates industry-wide cooperation with regulators, aca...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Palo Alto Networks
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Palo Alto Networks has signaled its commitment to responsible AI by becoming one of the first signatories of the EU Artificial Intelligence Pact. The cybersecurity firm also partners with others (e.g.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Qualcomm
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Qualcomm discusses AI safety and alignment in whitepapers and its ESG report. They emphasize compliance and research partnerships but lack a public ethics board or AI-specific leadership team.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Honeywell
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Honeywell has adopted formal Responsible AI Principles that cover accountability, safety, fairness, privacy, and transparency. The company’s AI governance emphasizes robust oversight and clear lines of responsibility,...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 69.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Amazon
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Following its EU AI Pact pledge, Amazon mapped high‑risk systems and rolled out impact‑assessment templates in Q1 2025, improving Regulatory Alignment.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 85.0 | 67.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
PayPal
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: PayPal outlines responsible AI practices focused on fairness, privacy, and risk mitigation in financial AI. Although no formal ethics committee exists, risk controls and stakeholder principles are disclosed.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 67.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Atlassian
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Atlassian released Responsible Tech Principles and promotes transparency in AI development. They engage internal teams and developers but have limited external oversight.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 66.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
AstraZeneca
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: AstraZeneca’s leadership stresses a strong framework to ensure AI is used ethically and responsibly, highlighting principles like transparency, accountability, and fairness in healthcare AI. The company advocates coll...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 65.0 | 66.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Comcast
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Comcast published its first AI transparency report in Mar 2025 and formalised Responsible AI Principles, boosting Transparency, Ethics, and Governance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 66.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
T-Mobile US
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: T-Mobile has outlined core AI Principles — “Responsibility, Fairness, and Transparency” — which employees are expected to integrate into everyday AI interactions. These principles, referenced in its Code of Business C...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 64.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
MicroStrategy
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: MicroStrategy emphasizes data privacy, AI explainability, and ethical AI development, incorporating bias detection and ensuring transparency in its AI platforms. This approach indicates a commitment to fair and accoun...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 61.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Linde
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Linde is recognized for strong overall ethics and compliance (e.g. named among 2025’s “World’s Most Ethical Companies”).
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Mondelēz International
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Mondelēz is beginning to integrate AI in its marketing operations and has committed to do so within a “responsible AI framework” to ensure ethical and legally compliant use. For example, a recent AI-powered content pl...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 59.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
CrowdStrike
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: CrowdStrike discusses responsible AI use in cybersecurity through blogs and surveys. Oversight remains internal, with no public policy or ethics board in place.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 58.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Airbnb
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Airbnb conducted a civil rights audit and launched 'Project Lighthouse' to reduce algorithmic bias. However, AI-specific governance remains limited.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 58.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 58.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Synopsys
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Synopsys publishes material on AI in chip design and references responsible practices in its ESG report. It participates in industry efforts on AI security but lacks formal AI oversight structures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Axon Enterprise
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Axon established an independent AI Ethics Board and heeded its recommendation to hold off on facial recognition in police body cameras. However, governance issues arose when Axon pursued a Taser-equipped drone project...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 57.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Biogen
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Biogen acknowledges that “responsible use of AI” can advance its mission to improve patients’ lives and commits to using AI ethically. This commitment is stated in its Code of Business Conduct.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 57.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Palantir
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Palantir launched an AI Ethics & Safety microsite in Mar 2025 and advanced EU AI Act preparations, raising Transparency and Regulatory Alignment.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 57.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Dexcom
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Dexcom’s AI-driven glucose monitoring devices are regulated by the FDA for safety and efficacy, and the company complies with stringent medical device standards. However, Dexcom has not published a distinct AI ethics ...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 80.0 | 40.0 | 55.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Netflix
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Netflix mentions responsible ML practices in blogs and research papers. It lacks public AI ethics principles and does not describe any governance board.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 52.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
The Trade Desk
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: The Trade Desk combines AI with human oversight in its ad platform, explicitly positioning itself as an “open platform that brings AI and humans together” for advertisers. Its executives warn against viewing AI as a b...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 51.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Baker Hughes
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Baker Hughes focuses on compliance and safety in its operations. Its corporate principles “champion compliance and ethics” and “ensure sustainable governance”, but there is no indication of a dedicated AI ethics program.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Fortinet
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Fortinet uses AI in cybersecurity and references responsible deployment in whitepapers. Ethics principles are not formalized, but compliance is strong.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Automatic Data Processing (ADP)
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: ADP has acknowledged the importance of ethical AI in its domain (noting challenges at the nexus of AI, privacy, and fairness in workforce management). It ensures its HR AI tools comply with anti-discrimination and dat...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 49.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Ansys
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Ansys mentions responsible AI practices in engineering simulations and addresses ethics as part of its innovation principles. Governance structure is not public.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 46.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Intuitive Surgical
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Intuitive mentions AI applications in medical robotics and cites regulatory compliance. However, it lacks an internal ethics policy or formal transparency reports.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 38.0 | 45.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Cadence Design Systems
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Cadence mentions responsible innovation and ethical design in its ESG documents. It uses AI in chip workflows but does not detail internal oversight.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 | 48.0 | 42.0 | 43.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Broadcom
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Broadcom focuses on AI infrastructure but has no AI-specific ethics disclosure. References to AI appear in investor materials only.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 55.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Marvell Technology
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Marvell includes AI in its product roadmap and addresses privacy, but it lacks AI-specific governance frameworks or ethical disclosures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Booking Holdings
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Booking Holdings (Booking.com) utilizes AI for personalized travel recommendations and pricing, and it discloses in its privacy policy that customer data is used to improve machine learning models. Beyond such transpa...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Datadog
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Datadog emphasizes customer data security and privacy (it’s certified on privacy standards) but has not issued any AI ethics guidelines. The company uses AI/ML for IT monitoring and analytics, focusing on compliance w...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
DoorDash
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: DoorDash’s algorithms for delivery dispatch and pay have been criticized for lack of transparency and fairness (e.g. past practices of using customer tips to subsidize wages, which led to a $16M+ settlement and change...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 34.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Zscaler
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Zscaler provides cloud security services using AI for threat detection. The company emphasizes zero-trust security and privacy, but it hasn’t published an AI ethics framework.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 33.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Electronic Arts (EA)
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Electronic Arts has discussed ethical considerations of AI in gaming (e.g. its R&D arm SEED explored AI’s social and aesthetic impacts), but the company has not published formal AI principles.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Micron Technology
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Micron refers to AI in the context of its products but does not maintain any public framework for responsible AI. ESG statements are limited to compliance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 45.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Costco Wholesale
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Costco leverages AI for inventory forecasting and personalized promotions, but has no public responsible AI policy. The retailer ensures compliance with consumer protection and privacy laws, yet there is no evidence o...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
ON Semiconductor
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: ON Semiconductor describes responsible innovation broadly. There is no dedicated AI policy, though privacy and fairness are mentioned in its ESG report.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 32.0 | 35.0 | 28.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 32.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
CoStar Group
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: CoStar Group uses AI-driven analytics in real estate data and property visualization, yet it has not published any responsible AI principles. Its focus remains on data accuracy and customer service.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 25.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
MercadoLibre
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: MercadoLibre, Latin America’s e-commerce leader, employs AI for recommendations, fraud detection, and lending decisions. While it likely follows applicable fintech regulations in various countries, MercadoLibre has no...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
MongoDB
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: MongoDB provides a database platform that can power AI applications, and it uses machine learning for performance optimization. The company has not published any AI ethics guidelines.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Gilead Sciences
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Gilead Sciences uses AI in drug discovery and clinical data analysis, but it has not issued any AI ethics statements. The company ensures its AI applications comply with medical research standards and patient privacy ...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Starbucks
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Starbucks employs AI for personalized offers (via its mobile app) and store operations (demand forecasting), yet it hasn’t published AI principles. The company emphasizes customer privacy and data security as part of ...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
PepsiCo
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: PepsiCo applies AI in manufacturing (e.g. optimizing production lines) and marketing analytics, but it does not provide a responsible AI policy.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 29.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Texas Instruments
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: TI focuses on semiconductor safety but lacks AI ethics disclosures or governance structures. Mentions of AI are limited to general-purpose product applications in investor materials.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 29.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Paccar
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Paccar, a truck manufacturer, invests in autonomous driving and driver-assist AI technologies. It complies with vehicle safety regulations and tests to ensure these AI systems meet standards.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Warner Bros. Discovery
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Warner Bros. Discovery employs AI for content recommendations and possibly video analysis, but it has not communicated any AI ethics guidelines.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
PDD Holdings (Pinduoduo)
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: PDD Holdings (which operates Pinduoduo) is subject to China’s emerging AI governance rules, but it has not released AI ethics principles in Western forums. The company’s use of AI in e-commerce and social shopping is ...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Xcel Energy
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Xcel Energy applies AI for grid optimization and predictive maintenance, but it has not issued any AI ethics or governance statements. The utility’s AI use is governed by reliability standards and regulatory oversight...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Vertex uses AI in drug research and patient data analysis under a framework of biomedical ethics and regulation. It has not published any AI ethics guidelines specific to the company.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Regeneron uses AI in biotech research (for example, in genetic data analysis and drug discovery) within a highly regulated environment. The company has not set out a standalone AI ethics charter.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Exelon
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Exelon applies AI for grid management and energy demand forecasting under the oversight of utility regulators, but it has not announced any AI ethics initiatives. Its emphasis is on reliability and compliance (e.g.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
IDEXX Laboratories
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: IDEXX Laboratories (veterinary diagnostics) employs advanced algorithms in its diagnostic tools, but there is no public information on an AI ethics program. The company’s focus is on regulatory compliance (for medical...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
GlobalFoundries
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: GlobalFoundries focuses on semiconductor manufacturing. Its ESG reporting does not address AI governance or principles explicitly.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 28.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 25.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Charter Communications
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Charter Communications (Spectrum) employs AI in operations (e.g. using AI to assist customer service agents), but provides no public responsible AI framework.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Amgen
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Amgen leverages AI for biopharmaceutical research and patient data insights, operating under strict regulatory oversight (FDA, EMA) for any AI-assisted diagnostics or drug development. The company hasn’t published sep...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
CSX
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: CSX employs AI in rail operations (for scheduling, safety monitoring, etc.), but does not publicize any AI ethics initiatives. The company’s governance of AI is limited to adhering to industry safety standards and reg...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 15.0 | 26.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Paychex
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Paychex utilizes AI for HR and payroll services (e.g. chatbots, anomaly detection in payroll) under a general compliance umbrella.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 26.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
KLA Corporation
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: KLA, a semiconductor equipment maker, incorporates AI in chip manufacturing processes for quality control, but it has not announced any responsible AI initiatives. The company’s governance centers on product safety an...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Roper Technologies
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Roper Technologies owns diversified software and engineering businesses (from medical software to industrial systems). It has not set out any unified AI ethics principles.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Microchip Technology
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Microchip Technology uses AI in designing and testing semiconductor products but does not report any AI ethics or governance programs. Its focus is fulfilling technical specifications and regulatory requirements (e.g.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Marriott International
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Marriott uses AI for pricing, personalization, and customer service (e.g. chatbots), but has not issued responsible AI guidelines.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Lam Research
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Lam Research applies AI and machine learning to optimize semiconductor manufacturing equipment, but it has not made any responsible AI commitments public. Its operations focus on performance and meeting client specs; ...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
CDW Corp.
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: CDW is a provider of IT solutions (often reselling and integrating other vendors’ technology). It has not published any policy on AI governance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Fastenal
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Fastenal uses AI minimally (e.g. for inventory and supply chain optimizations) and has not disclosed any AI governance efforts.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Diamondback Energy
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Diamondback Energy has not addressed AI ethics publicly. Any AI used (for seismic data analysis, operational efficiency, etc.) is managed internally under standard industry regulations and safety protocols.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Copart
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Copart has not made any public commitments regarding AI governance or ethics. As an online auto auctioneer, it likely uses AI for pricing and operations, but there is no evidence of transparency or ethical guidelines.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Cintas
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Cintas (uniform services) primarily applies automation and data analytics internally (e.g. to optimize logistics) and does not report any AI ethics measures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Analog Devices
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Analog Devices integrates AI in its semiconductor and sensor products (e.g. edge AI chips), but it has not made public commitments to AI ethics.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
American Electric Power (AEP)
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: American Electric Power uses AI for grid reliability and customer energy management under the purview of utility regulators. AEP has not announced any AI ethics guidelines.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
ASML
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: ASML has limited public disclosures on AI governance. It focuses on hardware manufacturing with little engagement in AI policy.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 24.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Constellation Energy
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Constellation Energy (power generation) has not made any public statements on AI governance. It may use AI for trading, maintenance or demand forecasting, all within the scope of energy market regulations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Keurig Dr Pepper
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Keurig Dr Pepper has no known AI governance or ethics policies. Any AI usage (such as in supply chain, quality control, or marketing analytics) is internal and limited.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Kraft Heinz
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Kraft Heinz uses AI in areas like demand planning and product development (e.g. analyzing consumer taste preferences), but the company has not issued any AI ethics or governance statements.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 23.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (the international bottling arm of Coke) might use AI for logistics and sales forecasting, but it has no public AI ethics or governance disclosures. The company concentrates on sustainab...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Lululemon Athletica
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Lululemon uses AI mainly in e-commerce (recommendation engines, inventory systems) without any public AI ethics policies. The brand’s governance around AI is limited to standard data privacy and consumer experience co...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Monster Beverage
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Monster Beverage has virtually no public-facing AI applications aside from standard business analytics, and it has no AI ethics policies disclosed. The company’s governance is focused on regulatory compliance in marke...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
O’Reilly Automotive
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: O’Reilly Automotive may use AI for inventory management and sales analytics, but it discloses no AI ethics or governance plans. The company’s priorities lie in traditional compliance (financial reporting, customer dat...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Old Dominion Freight Line
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Old Dominion uses algorithms for logistics and route optimization in trucking, but it has not communicated any AI ethics initiatives. The firm’s oversight of AI is limited to improving operational efficiency and compl...
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Ross Stores
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Ross Stores has not indicated any use of AI beyond routine retail analytics (inventory, site selection). It does not have any AI governance or ethics disclosures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Applied Materials
Q3’25: No new public AI governance updates. Ongoing: Applied Materials provides no AI governance principles or ethics disclosures. Mentions of AI are limited to industrial automation contexts in investor presentations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 30.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
AppLovin
Q3’25: Change — Transparency -2, Ethical Principles -2, Governance Structure -2, Regulatory Alignment -2. New: Critical reports/litigation alleging AI‑washing and manipulative practices; regulatory and legal scrutiny. Direction: major negative; **High‑Risk** controversy.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 15.0 | 17.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Tesla
Q3’25: Change — Ethical Principles -2, Governance Structure -2. New: Legal outcome (2025‑09‑17): Large damages linked to Autopilot fatality case. Direction: major negative on AI safety governance; **High‑Risk**.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | 20.0 | 13.0 | 8.0 | 25.0 | 15.0 | 16.0 |
Only the latest rebalance is available. Historical scores will appear as new rebalances are added.
Microsoft (MSFT)
Microsoft’s 21 Apr 2025 Secure Future report expanded red‑teaming metrics, open‑sourced PyRIT, and filed an OECD HAIP self‑assessment, lifting Transparency and Engagement.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 92.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 88.0 | 94.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 97.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | 92.0 | 95.0 |
Cisco (CSCO)
Cisco’s Responsible AI Framework includes six principles and is executed by a cross-functional Responsible AI Committee. The company collaborates with EqualAI and publishes guidelines on bias control and incident tracking.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 92.0 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 92.0 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 92.0 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 |
Alphabet (Google) (GOOGL)
Alphabet (Google) (GOOGL): Implemented new AI ethics guidelines in February 2025, marking a policy shift. Google’s updated AI Principles reversed a previous blanket prohibition on AI uses in weapons and surveillance, now allowing limited, “carefully monitored” applications in those areas under strict oversight. At the same time, Google’s latest Responsible AI progress report highlighted expanded governance structures for AI safety (e.g. enhanced oversight, security controls, and privacy measures). The new guidelines maintain a focus on responsible use but with more nuance; as a result, Google’s Ethical Principles score was adjusted slightly downward (reflecting the controversial policy relaxation) while its Governance Structure and Regulatory Alignment scores were nudged up (given its strengthened internal oversight and continued adoption of frameworks like NIST and impending EU AI Act compliance). Google continues to publish annual transparency reports on AI, so its Transparency and Stakeholder Engagement (e.g. collaborative research and external partnerships) remained high.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 89.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 89.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 89.0 |
Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Verisk has a rigorous AI ethics program. It issued a formal Ethical AI Policy with FAITH principles – Fairness, Accountability, Inclusivity, Transparency, and Honoring Privacy. Verisk’s AI governance framework includes defined accountable AI owners and oversight structures up to the Board level. The company works with external experts, regulators, and clients to continually refine its AI governance, demonstrating high transparency, regulatory alignment, and stakeholder engagement in ensuring its AI-driven insurance and analytics solutions are fair and trustworthy.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 86.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 86.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 86.0 |
NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVIDIA launched a Trustworthy AI initiative, formed a cross-functional ethics committee, and provides company-wide AI ethics training. It references EU and US AI frameworks and engages in multi-stakeholder forums.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 |
Cognizant (CTSH)
Cognizant has a comprehensive Responsible AI program. It published detailed AI Principles (covering fairness, transparency, accountability, security, etc.) and even achieved an accredited AI management certification. Cognizant aligns with global AI standards (OECD, UNESCO, EU AI Act, NIST, ISO) and has internal governance (the “TRUST” framework) to operationalize ethical AI across the company. This demonstrates strong governance and stakeholder engagement in AI ethics.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 84.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 84.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 84.0 |
Adobe (ADBE)
Adobe has published AI Ethics Principles for years and runs an internal AI review committee. It screens all new AI products and co-founded the Content Authenticity Initiative to promote transparency.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 83.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 83.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 83.0 |
GE HealthCare (GEHC)
GE HealthCare has made Responsible AI a pillar of its strategy. It developed seven Responsible AI Principles that guide its product development at every stage – focusing on serving human needs, respecting dignity and autonomy, and ensuring human oversight and control. GE HealthCare also established a Data and AI Governance Council (including a Responsible AI Council) to oversee these practices. By being transparent about its principles and collaborating with medical partners and regulators on AI (e.g. in validating AI for imaging with hospitals), GE HealthCare demonstrates strong regulatory alignment and stakeholder engagement to ensure its AI is safe and trustworthy in clinical settings.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 90.0 | 70.0 | 81.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 90.0 | 70.0 | 81.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 90.0 | 70.0 | 81.0 |
Intel (INTC)
Intel publishes its Responsible AI Principles and supports oversight via an internal AI ethics council. It is active in AI governance discourse globally and incorporates policy references in disclosures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 80.0 | 82.0 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 80.0 | 82.0 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 80.0 | 82.0 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
Fiserv (FI)
Fiserv has embedded responsible AI into its corporate practices. It explicitly mentions advancing “ethical AI” as part of building trust in financial technology. A cross-functional governance structure oversees the implementation of responsible AI and machine learning at Fiserv, establishing internal standards for appropriate use. This indicates high accountability, with AI oversight integrated into its risk management and a focus on fairness and security in financial AI solutions.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 70.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 70.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 70.0 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 |
NXP Semiconductors (NXPI)
NXP Semiconductors launched an AI Ethics initiative and advocates for ethical AI development, especially for edge and automotive AI. NXP’s framework emphasizes principles like human autonomy, explicability, and privacy-by-design. The company works with industry peers and governments on AI “code of conduct” efforts. By promoting a universal ethical framework and publishing a whitepaper on AI morals, NXP demonstrates strong governance and stakeholder collaboration in AI ethics, beyond just compliance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 |
Meta (Facebook) (META)
Meta invests in fairness audits, open-sources AI models, and engages with academia. While transparency has improved, a lack of external oversight board lowers its governance score.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 82.0 | 79.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 82.0 | 79.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 82.0 | 79.0 |
Apple (AAPL)
Apple approaches responsible AI through privacy-first design and on-device model deployment. It released Apple Intelligence with safeguards and published statements on AI responsibility.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 75.0 | 82.0 | 70.0 | 78.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 75.0 | 82.0 | 70.0 | 78.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 75.0 | 82.0 | 70.0 | 78.0 |
Intuit (INTU)
Intuit outlines Responsible AI Principles and uses a cross-functional risk evaluation process for AI features. It regularly involves external privacy and ethics experts in its product governance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 75.0 | 78.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 90.0 | 78.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 75.0 | 78.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 90.0 | 78.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 75.0 | 78.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 90.0 | 78.0 |
Autodesk (ADSK)
Autodesk is committed to responsible and ethical AI. The Autodesk Trust Center explicitly states it adheres to governance processes to ensure AI is developed and used ethically and securely. Autodesk has also signed the EU AI Pact, reflecting its pledge to support industry-wide responsible AI development. Internally, Autodesk integrates principles like fairness, transparency, and human safety in AI (for example, in generative design tools). This demonstrates solid governance and alignment with global ethical AI efforts, although detailed principles are communicated mainly through its trust and security documentation rather than a standalone manifesto.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 76.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 76.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 76.0 |
AMD (AMD)
AMD joined the Responsible AI Institute and formed an internal AI council. It’s early in its ethical AI journey but aligns with industry frameworks and begins structured reporting.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 73.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 73.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 73.0 |
Workday (WDAY)
Workday is notable for conducting external audits of its hiring AI to comply with NYC Local Law 144. They disclose fairness initiatives and maintain a responsible AI working group.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 68.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 68.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 68.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 78.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
Arm Holdings (ARM)
Arm has taken a proactive role in AI ethics: it formed an internal AI ethics working group and published an “AI Trust Manifesto” to guide ethical AI design. Arm advocates industry-wide cooperation with regulators, academia, and society on AI standards, emphasizing fairness, transparency, and accountability beyond its own operations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 72.0 |
Palo Alto Networks (PANW)
Palo Alto Networks has signaled its commitment to responsible AI by becoming one of the first signatories of the EU Artificial Intelligence Pact. The cybersecurity firm also partners with others (e.g. Accenture) to promote ethical AI practices in its domain and supports frameworks like NIST’s AI Risk Management for AI governance. While it hasn’t published its own detailed AI principles, PANW focuses on AI safety, transparency, and human oversight in its products, aligning with evolving regulations and engaging industry stakeholders on AI trust.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 |
Qualcomm (QCOM)
Qualcomm discusses AI safety and alignment in whitepapers and its ESG report. They emphasize compliance and research partnerships but lack a public ethics board or AI-specific leadership team.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 |
Honeywell (HON)
Honeywell has adopted formal Responsible AI Principles that cover accountability, safety, fairness, privacy, and transparency. The company’s AI governance emphasizes robust oversight and clear lines of responsibility, and it even extends expectations of ethical AI to its suppliers. While mainly internal, these principles demonstrate strong transparency commitments (e.g. “Transparent and Explainable” AI design) and alignment with emerging AI best practices.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 69.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 69.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 69.0 |
Amazon (AMZN)
Following its EU AI Pact pledge, Amazon mapped high‑risk systems and rolled out impact‑assessment templates in Q1 2025, improving Regulatory Alignment.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 65.0 | 85.0 | 65.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 85.0 | 67.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 85.0 | 67.0 |
PayPal (PYPL)
PayPal outlines responsible AI practices focused on fairness, privacy, and risk mitigation in financial AI. Although no formal ethics committee exists, risk controls and stakeholder principles are disclosed.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 67.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 67.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 67.0 |
AstraZeneca (AZN)
AstraZeneca’s leadership stresses a strong framework to ensure AI is used ethically and responsibly, highlighting principles like transparency, accountability, and fairness in healthcare AI. The company advocates collaboration with regulators, providers, and patients to build trust in AI innovations. While no standalone AI ethics charter is published, AZ’s approach aligns AI use with its broader commitments to patient safety and regulatory compliance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 65.0 | 66.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 65.0 | 66.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 65.0 | 66.0 |
Atlassian (TEAM)
Atlassian released Responsible Tech Principles and promotes transparency in AI development. They engage internal teams and developers but have limited external oversight.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 66.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 66.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 66.0 |
Comcast (CMCSA)
Comcast published its first AI transparency report in Mar 2025 and formalised Responsible AI Principles, boosting Transparency, Ethics, and Governance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 59.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 66.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 66.0 |
T-Mobile US (TMUS)
T-Mobile has outlined core AI Principles — “Responsibility, Fairness, and Transparency” — which employees are expected to integrate into everyday AI interactions. These principles, referenced in its Code of Business Conduct, signal a commitment to ethical AI use (e.g. avoiding biased outcomes and being transparent). While detailed implementations are not public, T-Mobile’s adoption of AI principles and its parent Deutsche Telekom’s AI guidelines indicate moderate governance and alignment with emerging best practices in AI ethics.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 64.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 64.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 64.0 |
MicroStrategy (MSTR)
MicroStrategy emphasizes data privacy, AI explainability, and ethical AI development, incorporating bias detection and ensuring transparency in its AI platforms. This approach indicates a commitment to fair and accountable AI use, though focused on product capabilities rather than a formal public ethics framework.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 61.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 61.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 61.0 |
Linde (LIN)
Linde is recognized for strong overall ethics and compliance (e.g. named among 2025’s “World’s Most Ethical Companies”). A board-led emphasis on transparency and legal compliance permeates its operations. However, Linde has not publicized any AI-specific ethics policy, suggesting its AI use (e.g. in industrial optimization) is governed only by its general Code of Business Integrity and existing safety regulations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 |
Mondelēz International (MDLZ)
Mondelēz is beginning to integrate AI in its marketing operations and has committed to do so within a “responsible AI framework” to ensure ethical and legally compliant use. For example, a recent AI-powered content platform is being built with design principles aimed at compliance and ethical safeguards from the start. While Mondelēz doesn’t publicly list AI principles, this initiative shows alignment with regulatory expectations and an intention to be transparent and fair in AI-driven personalization.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 59.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 59.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 | 59.0 |
CrowdStrike (CRWD)
CrowdStrike discusses responsible AI use in cybersecurity through blogs and surveys. Oversight remains internal, with no public policy or ethics board in place.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 58.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 58.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 65.0 | 58.0 |
Airbnb (ABNB)
Airbnb conducted a civil rights audit and launched 'Project Lighthouse' to reduce algorithmic bias. However, AI-specific governance remains limited.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 58.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 58.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 58.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 58.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 58.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 58.0 |
Synopsys (SNPS)
Synopsys publishes material on AI in chip design and references responsible practices in its ESG report. It participates in industry efforts on AI security but lacks formal AI oversight structures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 |
Axon Enterprise (AXON)
Axon established an independent AI Ethics Board and heeded its recommendation to hold off on facial recognition in police body cameras. However, governance issues arose when Axon pursued a Taser-equipped drone project without consulting the board, leading 9 of 12 ethics board members to resign in protest. This mix of engagement and missteps reflects moderate transparency and ethics oversight.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 57.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 57.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 57.0 |
Biogen (BIIB)
Biogen acknowledges that “responsible use of AI” can advance its mission to improve patients’ lives and commits to using AI ethically. This commitment is stated in its Code of Business Conduct. However, beyond this general statement and strict adherence to healthcare regulations and data privacy, Biogen has not published detailed AI governance measures or principles publicly.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 57.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 57.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 60.0 | 57.0 |
Palantir (PLTR)
Palantir launched an AI Ethics & Safety microsite in Mar 2025 and advanced EU AI Act preparations, raising Transparency and Regulatory Alignment.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 40.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 57.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 70.0 | 65.0 | 57.0 |
Dexcom (DXCM)
Dexcom’s AI-driven glucose monitoring devices are regulated by the FDA for safety and efficacy, and the company complies with stringent medical device standards. However, Dexcom has not published a distinct AI ethics policy. Its focus is on transparency in clinical performance and patient data privacy under health regulations, rather than any broader AI governance or public ethical commitments.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 80.0 | 40.0 | 55.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 80.0 | 40.0 | 55.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 80.0 | 40.0 | 55.0 |
Netflix (NFLX)
Netflix mentions responsible ML practices in blogs and research papers. It lacks public AI ethics principles and does not describe any governance board.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 52.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 52.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 60.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 52.0 |
The Trade Desk (TTD)
The Trade Desk combines AI with human oversight in its ad platform, explicitly positioning itself as an “open platform that brings AI and humans together” for advertisers. Its executives warn against viewing AI as a black-box “magic button” and stress the need for transparency, trust, and continued human judgment in AI-driven marketing. While TTD hasn’t issued a formal AI ethics charter, it promotes responsible practices (like requiring AI systems to be explainable and under human control) as part of its service ethos.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 51.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 51.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 51.0 |
Baker Hughes (BKR)
Baker Hughes focuses on compliance and safety in its operations. Its corporate principles “champion compliance and ethics” and “ensure sustainable governance”, but there is no indication of a dedicated AI ethics program. The company’s use of AI (e.g. for predictive maintenance and efficiency) is handled under general governance and HSE (health, safety, environment) standards rather than any explicit responsible AI policy.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 70.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 |
Fortinet (FTNT)
Fortinet uses AI in cybersecurity and references responsible deployment in whitepapers. Ethics principles are not formalized, but compliance is strong.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 |
Automatic Data Processing (ADP) (ADP)
ADP has acknowledged the importance of ethical AI in its domain (noting challenges at the nexus of AI, privacy, and fairness in workforce management). It ensures its HR AI tools comply with anti-discrimination and data protection laws. While ADP hasn’t published a formal responsible AI manifesto, its communications suggest a focus on fairness in algorithms (to avoid bias in hiring/pay decisions) and privacy. Overall, ADP demonstrates awareness of AI ethics issues and likely integrates those considerations into its product design, albeit with moderate transparency.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 49.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 49.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 55.0 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 49.0 |
Ansys (ANSS)
Ansys mentions responsible AI practices in engineering simulations and addresses ethics as part of its innovation principles. Governance structure is not public.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 46.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 46.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 48.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 46.0 |
Intuitive Surgical (ISRG)
Intuitive mentions AI applications in medical robotics and cites regulatory compliance. However, it lacks an internal ethics policy or formal transparency reports.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 38.0 | 45.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 38.0 | 45.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 42.0 | 45.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 | 38.0 | 45.0 |
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS)
Cadence mentions responsible innovation and ethical design in its ESG documents. It uses AI in chip workflows but does not detail internal oversight.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 | 48.0 | 42.0 | 43.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 | 48.0 | 42.0 | 43.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 | 48.0 | 42.0 | 43.0 |
Broadcom (AVGO)
Broadcom focuses on AI infrastructure but has no AI-specific ethics disclosure. References to AI appear in investor materials only.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 55.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 55.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 55.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 |
Marvell Technology (MRVL)
Marvell includes AI in its product roadmap and addresses privacy, but it lacks AI-specific governance frameworks or ethical disclosures.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 |
Booking Holdings (BKNG)
Booking Holdings (Booking.com) utilizes AI for personalized travel recommendations and pricing, and it discloses in its privacy policy that customer data is used to improve machine learning models. Beyond such transparency about data use, the company has not articulated any AI ethics guidelines. Its AI initiatives focus on enhancing customer experience within standard data privacy and consumer protection compliance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
Datadog (DDOG)
Datadog emphasizes customer data security and privacy (it’s certified on privacy standards) but has not issued any AI ethics guidelines. The company uses AI/ML for IT monitoring and analytics, focusing on compliance with data protection laws. No specific transparency reports or ethical AI frameworks have been noted, indicating limited stakeholder engagement on AI responsibility.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 36.0 |
DoorDash (DASH)
DoorDash’s algorithms for delivery dispatch and pay have been criticized for lack of transparency and fairness (e.g. past practices of using customer tips to subsidize wages, which led to a $16M+ settlement and changes in policy). In response, DoorDash has increased transparency in how tips and payments are handled, but the company still has no overarching AI ethics policy. Its governance improvements have been reactive to stakeholder (courier and regulator) pressure rather than proactive ethical oversight of its AI-driven gig-work platform.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 34.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 34.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 34.0 |
Electronic Arts (EA) (EA)
Electronic Arts has discussed ethical considerations of AI in gaming (e.g. its R&D arm SEED explored AI’s social and aesthetic impacts), but the company has not published formal AI principles. EA’s AI use in games (for NPC behavior, matchmaking, etc.) is guided primarily by user experience and regulatory concerns (like avoiding gambling-like mechanisms), rather than a transparent AI ethics governance structure.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
Micron Technology (MU)
Micron refers to AI in the context of its products but does not maintain any public framework for responsible AI. ESG statements are limited to compliance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 45.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 45.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 45.0 | 30.0 | 33.0 |
Zscaler (ZS)
Zscaler provides cloud security services using AI for threat detection. The company emphasizes zero-trust security and privacy, but it hasn’t published an AI ethics framework. Zscaler likely follows general responsible practices (avoiding bias in threat models, complying with data laws) and supports industry standards, but without formal transparency reporting or an ethics board. Its stakeholder engagement on AI is limited to clients and industry forums on security best practices.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 33.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 33.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 33.0 |
CoStar Group (CSGP)
CoStar Group uses AI-driven analytics in real estate data and property visualization, yet it has not published any responsible AI principles. Its focus remains on data accuracy and customer service. The company abides by standard data privacy and security norms, but there is no sign of a formal AI ethics or governance initiative involving external stakeholders.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 25.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 25.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 25.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
Costco Wholesale (COST)
Costco leverages AI for inventory forecasting and personalized promotions, but has no public responsible AI policy. The retailer ensures compliance with consumer protection and privacy laws, yet there is no evidence of formal AI governance or ethical guidelines beyond standard corporate conduct.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 |
ON Semiconductor (ON)
ON Semiconductor describes responsible innovation broadly. There is no dedicated AI policy, though privacy and fairness are mentioned in its ESG report.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 32.0 | 35.0 | 28.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 32.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 32.0 | 35.0 | 28.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 32.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 32.0 | 35.0 | 28.0 | 35.0 | 30.0 | 32.0 |
MercadoLibre (MELI)
MercadoLibre, Latin America’s e-commerce leader, employs AI for recommendations, fraud detection, and lending decisions. While it likely follows applicable fintech regulations in various countries, MercadoLibre has not published an AI ethics charter. Publicly, it focuses on business growth and inclusion (e.g. fintech access) rather than AI transparency. No significant stakeholder engagement on AI governance is noted internationally.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
MongoDB (MDB)
MongoDB provides a database platform that can power AI applications, and it uses machine learning for performance optimization. The company has not published any AI ethics guidelines. Its Trust Center highlights security and privacy, but not AI specifically. MongoDB’s governance of AI is mostly indirect (via ensuring its tools allow responsible data use by clients) and internally through standard engineering ethics. No explicit stakeholder engagement on AI ethics is evident.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 31.0 |
Gilead Sciences (GILD)
Gilead Sciences uses AI in drug discovery and clinical data analysis, but it has not issued any AI ethics statements. The company ensures its AI applications comply with medical research standards and patient privacy laws. There is no dedicated AI governance body or published principles, so transparency and stakeholder engagement on AI are minimal outside of regulatory compliance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
Starbucks (SBUX)
Starbucks employs AI for personalized offers (via its mobile app) and store operations (demand forecasting), yet it hasn’t published AI principles. The company emphasizes customer privacy and data security as part of its trust efforts. However, aside from complying with data protection laws (for its rewards and ordering systems), Starbucks provides little transparency into its algorithms and has no known AI ethics oversight group.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 |
PepsiCo (PEP)
PepsiCo applies AI in manufacturing (e.g. optimizing production lines) and marketing analytics, but it does not provide a responsible AI policy. Its governance of AI falls under its general data privacy and advertising standards compliance. PepsiCo has focused sustainability and social responsibility programs, but none specifically address AI ethics or transparency in algorithmic decision-making.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 29.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 29.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 29.0 |
Texas Instruments (TXN)
TI focuses on semiconductor safety but lacks AI ethics disclosures or governance structures. Mentions of AI are limited to general-purpose product applications in investor materials.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 29.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 29.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 29.0 |
Paccar (PCAR)
Paccar, a truck manufacturer, invests in autonomous driving and driver-assist AI technologies. It complies with vehicle safety regulations and tests to ensure these AI systems meet standards. However, Paccar hasn’t published a responsible AI manifesto. Its governance emphasizes functional safety and legal compliance in AI (e.g. following emerging autonomous vehicle guidelines), with limited broader transparency or ethical discussions publicly.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD)
Warner Bros. Discovery employs AI for content recommendations and possibly video analysis, but it has not communicated any AI ethics guidelines. The media company’s governance around AI focuses on meeting content standards and privacy laws (for user data in streaming services). It has not joined public AI ethics coalitions or released principles, indicating low transparency and formal ethical oversight in its AI utilization.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 28.0 |
Amgen (AMGN)
Amgen leverages AI for biopharmaceutical research and patient data insights, operating under strict regulatory oversight (FDA, EMA) for any AI-assisted diagnostics or drug development. The company hasn’t published separate AI principles; it relies on its existing R&D ethics and compliance frameworks. There is no special transparency on AI, beyond reporting clinical trial algorithms to regulators as required, and no explicit stakeholder outreach on AI governance issues.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Charter Communications (CHTR)
Charter Communications (Spectrum) employs AI in operations (e.g. using AI to assist customer service agents), but provides no public responsible AI framework. The company’s focus is on leveraging AI for efficiency, with adherence to basic privacy and FCC regulations. There is scant evidence of proactive transparency or ethical oversight specific to AI.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
Exelon (EXC)
Exelon applies AI for grid management and energy demand forecasting under the oversight of utility regulators, but it has not announced any AI ethics initiatives. Its emphasis is on reliability and compliance (e.g. meeting power industry regulations). There is minimal transparency about AI and no dedicated ethics framework or external engagement specific to AI.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
GlobalFoundries (GFS)
GlobalFoundries focuses on semiconductor manufacturing. Its ESG reporting does not address AI governance or principles explicitly.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 28.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 25.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 28.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 25.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 28.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 25.0 | 27.0 |
IDEXX Laboratories (IDXX)
IDEXX Laboratories (veterinary diagnostics) employs advanced algorithms in its diagnostic tools, but there is no public information on an AI ethics program. The company’s focus is on regulatory compliance (for medical device software) and accuracy of results. It has not released AI principles or stakeholder reports, indicating low transparency and formal governance specific to AI.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
PDD Holdings (Pinduoduo) (PDD)
PDD Holdings (which operates Pinduoduo) is subject to China’s emerging AI governance rules, but it has not released AI ethics principles in Western forums. The company’s use of AI in e-commerce and social shopping is high (recommendation algorithms, etc.), yet its governance focus is mainly compliance with Chinese regulations and user growth. Little information is available on transparency or ethical safeguards, indicating a low public profile on AI ethics and limited engagement outside regulatory mandates.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN)
Regeneron uses AI in biotech research (for example, in genetic data analysis and drug discovery) within a highly regulated environment. The company has not set out a standalone AI ethics charter. It relies on existing frameworks for clinical research ethics and data protection. There is minimal public disclosure about its AI systems and no evidence of separate governance committees on AI ethics, beyond standard scientific oversight and regulatory compliance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX)
Vertex uses AI in drug research and patient data analysis under a framework of biomedical ethics and regulation. It has not published any AI ethics guidelines specific to the company. Governance of AI is handled through its R&D protocols and compliance with clinical trial regulations and patient privacy laws. There is little public transparency or outreach on AI ethics beyond those standard obligations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
Xcel Energy (XEL)
Xcel Energy applies AI for grid optimization and predictive maintenance, but it has not issued any AI ethics or governance statements. The utility’s AI use is governed by reliability standards and regulatory oversight for utilities. There is no indication of additional transparency to the public about AI systems or any engagement in ethical AI initiatives, beyond ensuring compliance with energy sector regulations and cybersecurity norms.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 |
CSX (CSX)
CSX employs AI in rail operations (for scheduling, safety monitoring, etc.), but does not publicize any AI ethics initiatives. The company’s governance of AI is limited to adhering to industry safety standards and regulatory requirements for rail systems. There is little to no transparency or external engagement regarding AI-specific impacts or policies.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 15.0 | 26.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 15.0 | 26.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 15.0 | 26.0 |
Paychex (PAYX)
Paychex utilizes AI for HR and payroll services (e.g. chatbots, anomaly detection in payroll) under a general compliance umbrella. There is no public Paychex AI ethics policy. However, given its field, Paychex likely ensures its AI respects employment laws (avoid bias in any HR tools) and data privacy (for payroll info). Overall transparency on AI is low and no dedicated governance body or external partnerships on AI ethics are reported.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 26.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 26.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 26.0 |
Analog Devices (ADI)
Analog Devices integrates AI in its semiconductor and sensor products (e.g. edge AI chips), but it has not made public commitments to AI ethics. Its priority is ensuring its components meet safety and performance standards for customers. ADI’s governance addresses quality and compliance (including export controls for advanced tech), not broader ethical issues of AI. There’s little transparency on how AI is used or controlled within the company’s offerings from an ethics standpoint.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
CDW Corp. (CDW)
CDW is a provider of IT solutions (often reselling and integrating other vendors’ technology). It has not published any policy on AI governance. CDW’s involvement with AI is through the products it sells (which may include AI features), and it focuses on advising customers on IT best practices. Internally, no evidence of AI ethics oversight is present, and its corporate responsibility reporting does not highlight AI.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Cintas (CTAS)
Cintas (uniform services) primarily applies automation and data analytics internally (e.g. to optimize logistics) and does not report any AI ethics measures. The company’s governance is centered on compliance and safety. There are no indications of AI transparency efforts or ethical guidelines, given its limited public-facing AI use.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Copart (CPRT)
Copart has not made any public commitments regarding AI governance or ethics. As an online auto auctioneer, it likely uses AI for pricing and operations, but there is no evidence of transparency or ethical guidelines. The company relies on general business conduct policies and industry regulations, with no dedicated stakeholder engagement on AI issues.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Diamondback Energy (FANG)
Diamondback Energy has not addressed AI ethics publicly. Any AI used (for seismic data analysis, operational efficiency, etc.) is managed internally under standard industry regulations and safety protocols. There is no sign of AI transparency or special governance; the company relies on its general compliance culture without stakeholder engagement on AI.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Fastenal (FAST)
Fastenal uses AI minimally (e.g. for inventory and supply chain optimizations) and has not disclosed any AI governance efforts. The company’s operations adhere to general business ethics and efficiency goals. There is no public-facing AI transparency or stakeholder engagement – its AI usage remains internal and purely practical.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
KLA Corporation (KLAC)
KLA, a semiconductor equipment maker, incorporates AI in chip manufacturing processes for quality control, but it has not announced any responsible AI initiatives. The company’s governance centers on product safety and customer requirements. There is no sign of transparency or published ethical guidelines for its AI – KLA’s AI is managed within existing corporate and industry regulatory frameworks.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Lam Research (LRCX)
Lam Research applies AI and machine learning to optimize semiconductor manufacturing equipment, but it has not made any responsible AI commitments public. Its operations focus on performance and meeting client specs; any AI governance is internal. Lam adheres to general corporate ethics and export/regulatory rules, with no separate AI ethics disclosure or stakeholder engagement.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Marriott International (MAR)
Marriott uses AI for pricing, personalization, and customer service (e.g. chatbots), but has not issued responsible AI guidelines. The company’s primary governance is through customer data privacy policies and compliance with consumer protection laws. There’s little transparency on how algorithms make decisions (like room rate optimization), and no dedicated stakeholder engagement around AI ethics in hospitality has been observed.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Microchip Technology (MCHP)
Microchip Technology uses AI in designing and testing semiconductor products but does not report any AI ethics or governance programs. Its focus is fulfilling technical specifications and regulatory requirements (e.g. safety standards for chips in automotive/aerospace). The company has not provided transparency about AI processes, nor signals of an ethics framework, indicating low stakeholder engagement on AI matters.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
Roper Technologies (ROP)
Roper Technologies owns diversified software and engineering businesses (from medical software to industrial systems). It has not set out any unified AI ethics principles. Each subsidiary likely follows industry-specific regulations (e.g. healthcare software following patient data rules), but at the corporate level Roper hasn’t published AI governance policies or engaged publicly on AI ethics. Overall transparency on AI is low, managed within each business line’s normal compliance structure.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 |
American Electric Power (AEP) (AEP)
American Electric Power uses AI for grid reliability and customer energy management under the purview of utility regulators. AEP has not announced any AI ethics guidelines. Its governance emphasizes safety, reliability, and cybersecurity. There is negligible public transparency about AI decision systems (like outage predictions), and no known stakeholder engagement specifically around AI ethics, beyond compliance with utility industry rules.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
ASML (ASML)
ASML has limited public disclosures on AI governance. It focuses on hardware manufacturing with little engagement in AI policy.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 24.0 |
Constellation Energy (CEG)
Constellation Energy (power generation) has not made any public statements on AI governance. It may use AI for trading, maintenance or demand forecasting, all within the scope of energy market regulations. The company’s main public commitments involve clean energy and compliance; there are no visible transparency reports or ethical guidelines concerning AI. Stakeholder engagement on AI issues is effectively nil.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP)
Keurig Dr Pepper has no known AI governance or ethics policies. Any AI usage (such as in supply chain, quality control, or marketing analytics) is internal and limited. The company’s public focus is on product and sustainability compliance. It does not provide transparency about AI systems nor engage stakeholders on AI impacts, reflecting a very minimal approach to AI ethics.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 24.0 |
Kraft Heinz (KHC)
Kraft Heinz uses AI in areas like demand planning and product development (e.g. analyzing consumer taste preferences), but the company has not issued any AI ethics or governance statements. Its emphasis remains on food safety compliance and marketing standards. There is effectively no public transparency or dedicated oversight regarding AI ethics in its operations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 23.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 23.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 23.0 |
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP)
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (the international bottling arm of Coke) might use AI for logistics and sales forecasting, but it has no public AI ethics or governance disclosures. The company concentrates on sustainability and supply chain compliance. There is no sign of transparency regarding AI tools or algorithms, and no explicit engagement with AI ethics initiatives, reflecting a very low governance profile in this area.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Lululemon Athletica (LULU)
Lululemon uses AI mainly in e-commerce (recommendation engines, inventory systems) without any public AI ethics policies. The brand’s governance around AI is limited to standard data privacy and consumer experience considerations. There is no evidence of transparency about its algorithms or of engaging stakeholders on AI impacts (e.g. fairness in customer data use).
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Monster Beverage (MNST)
Monster Beverage has virtually no public-facing AI applications aside from standard business analytics, and it has no AI ethics policies disclosed. The company’s governance is focused on regulatory compliance in marketing and product safety. There are no transparency reports or stated ethical guidelines involving AI, given the limited scope of AI use in its operations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY)
O’Reilly Automotive may use AI for inventory management and sales analytics, but it discloses no AI ethics or governance plans. The company’s priorities lie in traditional compliance (financial reporting, customer data privacy) and efficient operations. There is no sign of AI transparency measures or stakeholder engagement on algorithmic issues in this auto-parts retail context.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL)
Old Dominion uses algorithms for logistics and route optimization in trucking, but it has not communicated any AI ethics initiatives. The firm’s oversight of AI is limited to improving operational efficiency and complying with transportation safety and labor regulations. It does not provide transparency into its AI systems, nor engage in discussions about the ethical impact of automation on drivers or other stakeholders.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Ross Stores (ROST)
Ross Stores has not indicated any use of AI beyond routine retail analytics (inventory, site selection). It does not have any AI governance or ethics disclosures. The company’s focus is on compliance with retail regulations and financial reporting. There is effectively no engagement in AI ethics or transparency, reflecting very low performance on AI governance metrics.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
Applied Materials (AMAT)
Applied Materials provides no AI governance principles or ethics disclosures. Mentions of AI are limited to industrial automation contexts in investor presentations.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 30.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 30.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 30.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 |
AppLovin (APP)
AppLovin has faced allegations of opaque and unethical practices in its AI-powered ad platform – for example, reports claim the company was “intentionally vague about how its AI technology actually works,” using it as a smokescreen for exploitative tactics. There is no evidence of a responsible AI policy, and recent lawsuits underscore deficiencies in transparency and governance.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 19.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 19.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 19.0 |
Tesla (TSLA)
Tesla lacks published AI principles and has faced multiple regulatory concerns over Autopilot. No responsible AI committee or transparency report is available.
History
| Rebalance Date | Transparency | Ethical Principles | Governance Structure | Regulatory Alignment | Stakeholder Engagement | AIGES Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 15.0 | 17.0 |
| 2025-04-01 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 15.0 | 17.0 |
| 2025-07-01 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 15.0 | 17.0 |